Skip to content
Velarozone

For licensees with a framework or review due

A licensee with an AML framework or review due

The short answer

A licensee with an AML/CFT framework to build, or a review, audit or inspection due, should test the framework against its own regulator's rulebook and the federal AML law. For a VARA licensee, Part III of the Compliance and Risk Management Rulebook sets the test: a Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO) with at least two years of AML/CFT experience, a Compliance Officer with five years in compliance, and a quarterly MLRO report to the board. We close the gaps in order of risk and assemble the evidence a reviewer will ask for.

A reviewer judges an AML framework on two points: whether it fits the business's actual risks, and whether it can be shown to work. The first is the business risk assessment (customers, products, geographies, channels) and the policies that follow from it. The second is evidence: due-diligence files, monitoring alerts and how each was closed, suspicious transaction reports filed on goAML, training records and the MLRO's quarterly reports to the board. Under VARA's rulebook those reports must be available to VARA on request, so a framework that exists only on paper fails at that point.

Reviews arrive from several directions: the regulator's inspection cycle, the rulebook's periodic independent review, an auditor's request, or a bank's or counterparty's onboarding questions. The businesses that pass reviewed themselves first. Under VARA's rulebook the MLRO and Compliance Officer appointments are themselves reviewed every year, so that date belongs in the diary. The work here is that self-review, ordered by risk and finished before the regulator's letter arrives.

This is for you if

  • You are licensed by VARA, a financial free-zone regulator, the Central Bank or another authority that requires an AML framework.
  • Your framework has to be built for a licence application or a new activity.
  • An independent review, an audit or a regulator's inspection is due, or overdue.
  • A bank or a counterparty has asked to see your AML controls before onboarding you.

This may not be the right route if

  • You want a framework written to be filed and forgotten.
  • You want a legal opinion on the law; that comes from a licensed law firm, which we coordinate.
  • You expect the regulator's finding to be promised.

At a glance

Indicative cost
Regulator fees, where any, are the regulator's; the Velarozone service fee for the gap review and the remediation is fixed against a defined scope, with ongoing support monthly, in your engagement letter.
Timing
The gap review in weeks; remediation ordered by risk; the review, audit or inspection supported on its own schedule.
What's included
  • A gap review against the rulebook and the law
  • Risk assessment, policies and processes built or corrected
  • The evidence pack a reviewer asks for

What this service includes

  • A gap review of the framework against the regulator's rulebook and the federal AML law, ordered by risk.
  • The business risk assessment written or refreshed; policies and procedures drafted or corrected.
  • Customer due-diligence, monitoring and reporting processes designed to produce evidence as they run.
  • Training delivered and recorded; the MLRO's quarterly board report set up, including the summary of Anonymity-Enhanced Transactions where VARA's rulebook applies.
  • The evidence pack prepared for the independent review, the auditor or the regulator.

What it does not include

  • Legal opinions on the law or the rulebook, which come from a licensed law firm.
  • Any assurance of the regulator's or a reviewer's finding.
  • Acting as a shield: a compliance officer reports what the rules require, including to the regulator.

Process

How the work is sequenced

Each stage has its own dependencies (activity approvals, document legalisation, authority processing, and bank review), and we report progress against them rather than against one overall date.

  1. 01

    Gap review

    The framework read against the rulebook and the law; findings ordered by risk.

  2. 02

    Remediate

    Risk assessment, policies, processes and governance built or corrected.

  3. 03

    Evidence

    Files, registers and records assembled as a reviewer will ask for them.

Need the officer as well as the framework? The fractional-roles page fills the role.

Prefer to start in writing? Send the details through the contact form.

Start with a structure assessment

In an initial consultation you receive a plain-language decision summary, a document-preparation list, and the next actions for your situation. Current figures are confirmed within your adviser-reviewed route comparison.

Message us on WhatsApp

What a reviewer tests

The framework, element by element

A review walks these in order and asks for the evidence behind each.

Elements of an AML/CFT framework and the evidence a reviewer expects for each.

  • Business risk assessment

    What it must do
    Identify and rate the risks the business actually runs
    Evidence
    The assessment, its methodology and its approval
  • Policies and procedures

    What it must do
    Say what staff do about each risk
    Evidence
    Documents, versions, approvals, staff acknowledgement
  • Customer due diligence

    What it must do
    Identify, verify and risk-rate every customer, with enhanced measures where required
    Evidence
    Sampled customer files
  • Monitoring

    What it must do
    Monitor continuously against written indicators, using methods that Senior Management has approved
    Evidence
    Alerts, who reviewed each, how it was closed, and the Senior Management approval of the methods
  • Reporting

    What it must do
    Report suspicion to the UAE FIU on the goAML platform, immediately under VARA's rule, and never tip off the customer
    Evidence
    goAML filings, the MLRO's register, and FIU or VARA information requests answered within 48 hours
  • Governance and training

    What it must do
    VARA: an MLRO with two years' AML/CFT experience, a Compliance Officer reporting to the Board, trained staff
    Evidence
    Appointment files reviewed annually, quarterly MLRO reports to the board, training records

The service

Regulatory consulting and fractional roles

VARA licensing advisory, AML/CFT framework work, and fractional MLRO, compliance officer and CFO cover for regulated businesses.

See the consulting service
Downtown Dubai skyline with the Burj Khalifa at golden hour

Every route is planned against how the business will actually operate in the UAE.

Questions

Frequently asked

How often must the framework be reviewed?
It depends on the regulator. Under VARA's rulebook the MLRO and Compliance Officer appointments are reviewed annually, the MLRO reports on the framework's effectiveness to the board every quarter, and the monitoring methods are reviewed periodically. Your own regulator sets the independent review cycle and inspection dates. We diarise all of them.
Can the same person be compliance officer and reporting officer?
Under VARA's rulebook the MLRO may hold another non-client-facing role only if the duties do not conflict, and it names the Compliance Officer and head of risk roles as ones that can. The Compliance Officer must be full-time and report directly to the Board. Both appointments are reviewed annually. Other regulators set their own rules.
What does a regulator's inspection look like?
Expect a request for documents and files, interviews with the officers, and sampled customer files and monitoring records. Under VARA's rulebook the MLRO's quarterly board reports must be available on request. After a suspicious transaction report, information requests from the UAE FIU or VARA must be answered within 48 hours. The evidence pack is built so each request is answered from the file.
Our bank has asked for our AML policy. Is that normal?
Yes, for licensed and higher-risk businesses; the bank has its own obligation to understand your controls. A framework that can be shown is what keeps the account open.
What does it cost?
A gap review and remediation are quoted as a fixed Velarozone service fee against a defined scope; ongoing support is monthly. Both are itemised in your engagement letter.

Sources

Regulations, fees, and eligibility can change. Every regulatory statement is re-checked before publication and dated above.

Legal notes and scope