Skip to content

Guide

Setting Up an Insolvency, Restructuring or Liquidation Practice in the UAE

Published

The short answer

Onshore, restructuring, preventive settlement and bankruptcy cases are opened and run by the competent UAE court under the Financial Restructuring and Bankruptcy Law, which appoints a trustee for each case rather than licensing a firm in advance. A DIFC or ADGM liquidation or administration instead runs through DIFC Courts or ADGM Courts under their own insolvency regimes, each with its own eligibility rule for the practitioner named to the case. The one thing that decides the route is whether the business wants to be the appointed trustee, liquidator or administrator itself, or to advise and support appointees who already hold that standing. The first needs a standing most new entrants do not yet have.

Who decides: courts, not a licence application

A trading licence for "insolvency" or "restructuring" consultancy does not, by itself, make a firm eligible to act as a trustee, liquidator or administrator. Onshore, the competent court opens a restructuring, preventive settlement or bankruptcy case and appoints a trustee to it; eligibility to be considered for that appointment is a separate question from the commercial licence. In the DIFC, DIFC Courts administer the DIFC Insolvency Law and decide who may act as office-holder in a DIFC company's case. In ADGM, ADGM Courts administer the ADGM Insolvency Regulations on the same logic. A firm can be correctly licensed to give restructuring advice and still have no standing to be appointed trustee, liquidator or administrator in any of the three regimes until it clears that separate bar, a distinction worth testing against how regulated professional advice is assessed more generally.

What the regime actually asks for

The structure is the same across onshore, DIFC and ADGM even though the authorities differ: a case is opened before a court, not registered as a service; a named trustee, liquidator or administrator is attached to that specific case; and the office-holder answers to the court for independence, the handling of estate assets and the treatment of creditors. None of the three regimes licenses a consultancy to describe itself generically as "an insolvency practice" in the way a trading activity is approved. A firm that wants eligibility to be appointed needs to meet the specific standing rule of the regime it is working in (onshore, in the DIFC, or in ADGM) before it accepts a case, not after.

How client and creditor money moves

Estate assets, creditor recoveries and any client money held during a case sit in segregated client-money arrangements, kept apart from the firm's own operating funds at every stage, under the oversight of the court or authority running the case. A bank assessing the practice for account readiness will want to see exactly which funds the firm ever controls, which it only reports on, and how estate money is reconciled against each case file. Where the source of funds behind a restructuring or a creditor payment is unusual (an overseas lender, a related-party settlement, an asset sale), the practice should be able to show where that money came from before a bank or a court asks.

Ownership, independence and the roles that must be filled

Independence from both the debtor and the creditors is central to every regime here, not an optional safeguard. Before taking a mandate, the practice needs a named individual meeting the eligibility rule of the regime involved, a conflicts check against the debtor and its known creditors, and a record of who within the firm has signing authority over estate matters. Where the practice is structured through a DIFC or ADGM entity specifically to access that regime's regulated standing, the ownership and governance of that entity should be set up as a regulated or complex ownership structure from the outset, rather than adjusted after a case is already open.

What commonly goes wrong

  • Describing advisory work as if the firm already held trustee, liquidator or administrator standing
  • Accepting a mandate while a related entity still owes money to, or is owed money by, the debtor
  • Moving estate assets or paying a creditor before the court appointment is confirmed
  • Treating a DIFC or ADGM standing as if it were recognised automatically onshore, or the reverse

Most of these trace back to the same error: assuming that a commercial licence to advise on restructuring also carries the separate standing to act as office-holder in a case.

Licence, operating file and renewal

Once a firm has cleared the eligibility rule for a regime, the operating file still needs the named individual's own professional indemnity cover, visas for the people actually running cases, and a renewal cycle that keeps the appointment current rather than lapsing between cases. Cost here is built in layers rather than one headline figure, and the Velarozone fee for this work is set out in the engagement letter; see how Velarozone works for that structure.

Container terminal and cranes at a Dubai port

General guidance here; the detail that matters depends on your activity and markets.

Questions

Frequently asked

Can a firm act as liquidator without being appointed by a court?
For a solvent, voluntary closure, yes: a licensed liquidator firm can be engaged directly by the shareholders and the relevant licensing authority, without a bankruptcy case being opened. Court appointment applies to the restructuring, preventive settlement and bankruptcy cases run under the Financial Restructuring and Bankruptcy Law, and to DIFC and ADGM office-holder appointments under their own regimes.
Does a DIFC or ADGM standing carry over to an onshore case?
Not automatically. DIFC Courts and ADGM Courts each run their own insolvency regime with its own eligibility rule for the practitioner named to a case, and onshore cases run under the Financial Restructuring and Bankruptcy Law before the competent court. A firm working across more than one regime needs to clear each one on its own terms.
Can the same team advise the debtor and a creditor on one case?
No. Independence from both sides is a condition of the appointment in every regime covered here, and a conflicting interest, through the firm or a related party, should be cleared before a mandate is accepted, not disclosed afterwards.
What happens to money held on a creditor's behalf during a case?
It sits in a segregated client-money arrangement, separate from the firm's own funds, for as long as the case runs, with the court or authority overseeing the case retaining visibility over it.

Get your UAE setup plan

Velarozone compares the court, DIFC and ADGM routes for an insolvency, restructuring or liquidation practice, the standing each one actually requires, and where advisory work stops and appointed office-holder work begins, before anything is filed.

Apply this to your own situation

Guides describe the general position. Send us your facts and an adviser will tell you which parts actually apply to you.

Message us on WhatsApp

Free assessment: current figures are confirmed within your adviser-reviewed route comparison. Your details are not shared with third parties.

Start with a structure assessment

In an initial consultation you receive a plain-language decision summary, a document-preparation list, and the next actions for your situation. Current figures are confirmed within your adviser-reviewed route comparison.

This guide provides general information, not legal, regulatory, tax, investment, medical or financial advice. It does not guarantee a licence, authorisation, visa, bank account, funding, tax treatment or commercial outcome.

General information drawn from the CBUAE Rulebook, including the Retail Payment Services and Card Schemes Regulation (C 15/2021), and Cabinet Resolution No. (134) of 2025 as published, not legal or tax advice. Rules and guidance change, so confirm the current text and each institution's own requirements before you submit.